The harsh ride that most people complain about is not inherent in the fork, it's the result of abysmal tuning on the part of Girvin; as it comes from the factory the fork is quite simply overdamped to a fault. This behavior is fairly easy to correct and, once corrected, the Vector provides performance which is almost unparalleled in the industry. I'm here to tell you how to do it.
There's a better way.
With an electric drill fitted with a 9mm bit, enlarge the hole in the small elastomer. This allows the elastomer to slide much more freely on the spindle and significantly improves small-impact performance. Because the elastomer deforms during the drilling it can take some effort to enlarge the hole enough; you can make the task a little easier by freezing the elastomer before you drill.
While you have the elastomers off you should liberally lubricate the
spindle and elastomer holes. A dry lubricant such as BoShield is
preferable, but waterproof grease works fine (although it will need to
be reapplied several times).
Welcome to the Big Time (or: fixing the ODS unit)
Drilling out the elastomer improves small-bump performance, but
curiously does nothing at all to midrange or big bump performance,
which remain rather harsh.
This is due to overdamping by the ODS unit affecting the compression of the elastomer stack. The ODS unit comes filled with 30wt oil from Girvin, which is insanely heavy for their damper. Experimentation reveals that optimum damping is seen with weights ranging from 7.5wt to 15wt -- at least half the weight of stock, and as little as a quarter! For a mid-weight rider (150lbs or so) 10wt oil is very close to ideal; lighter riders may want to go a bit lighter, and heavier riders may want to go as high as 15wt. No one wants 30wt.
To change the oil in the ODS unit you must first open it up, as follows:
Unfortunately there are several serious problems with elastomers:
Once oil dampers were being included in elastomer shocks there were no practical reasons why metal springs couldn't be used in place of elastomers. While the suspension fork manufacturers stuck with elastomers, it's likely that they did so primarily because they already had significant investments in that technology. Aftermarket suppliers such as Mountain Speed and others picked up where the manufacturers left off, offering drop-in replacements such as Speed Springs which improve small bump compliance significantly and increase effective travel through their linear response rates.
Metal springs correct several deficiencies in the stock elastomer setup of the Girvin Vector. Since they have no contact with the damper spindle there is no friction to induce stiction, so small-bump performance is dramatically enhanced. In theory the linear spring rate should improve effective travel too: the stock configuration offers a mere 1.75" of real travel versus the claimed 2.5"; while this is good enough for cross-country use, it is considerably less than the real-world travel offered by most cross-country telescoping forks on the market.
My first exposure to a steel spring replacement on the Vector was with a friend's fork; he had replaced the elastomers with a 200lb Noleen spring from the rear of an Azonics T-1 full-suspension bike. While this upgrade worked very well compared to the stock elastomers, it had three deficiencies compared to upgrades such as the Mountain Speed SpeedPro spring kit (pictured above):
To date steel springs such as the SpeedPro in combination with lighter oil in the ODS unit offer the best possible configuration for the Girvin Vector. These two changes provide excellent response throughout the entire fork travel, making it both more comfortable in cross-country applications and a very usable downhill fork for hardtails and short-travel full-suspension bicycles. The only detriment to the upgrade is added weight -- the 3.3lb weight of the stock Vector bulks out to approximately 3.6lbs. In practice, however, the weight goes unnoticed compared to the dramatic improvement in the fork's effectiveness.
What Girvin Is Doing
Now that you've learned what's wrong with the Vector and some
techniques to fix it, you are probably asking yourself why Girvin
hasn't made these changes themselves. After all, it could hardly have
escaped their notice that the fork action is not particularly smooth,
and they had ample time to play with oil weights and elastomer
configurations during research and testing.
I wish I knew. The tuning changes described in the early part of the article were obvious even to someone like myself with limited engineering education and experience, and customers such as myself have repeatedly attempted to discuss the tuning of their forks with them but have received little if any response.
Early peeks at the 1997 Vector lineup indicate that the feedback has not gone unnoticed, however. Girvin will be using a lighter weight oil in their elastomer-equipped ODS units, which should significantly improve their performance. In addition, Girvin will be offering Vectors equipped with Noleen coil-over shocks rather than elastomers, so it will no longer be necessary to use aftermarket springs to see optimum performance from your Vector.
The NR-1 shock Girvin will be using is already available as an upgrade. Unfortunately this unit offers no advantages over a tuned ODS unit with the SpeedPro spring, and costs nearly three times as much.
1997 may well prove to be the year where Girvin gets their shock right; but current Vector owners can have that same performance now.